Loading...
Showing posts with label Hot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hot. Show all posts
pdey louch mean srey 46

pdey louch mean srey 46

For criminal attorney single?

as a fresher i was worn out seriously next following one year To take revenge from the senior who had torn me I brought a battle with him and softened his one limb up school premises.would i be rebuffed by law for lt. I have likewise grumbled to school key about ragging yet no clamor was taken Now…

Great supporter inside Florida to sue the DA for giving my social guarantee number to a criminal? Does anybody no a decent Attorney to contract for document a claim against the District Attorney contained by the STATE OF FLORIDA for passing my government disability number out by oversight to around four extraordinary crooks. Along alongside parcel’s of other touchy information..home…

Great and not costly criminal promoter encompassed by London, which one? Sorry, yet I understand you will find that great and shabby are not descriptive words connected with the legitimately perceived calling. a decent and not costly legal counselor and encompassed by london?? that is criminal ! legal counselors are lavish ! In case you’re searching for a decent yet modest legal counselor you truly need…

Great criminal promoter shippensburg dad?

who are some great no awesome criminal attorneys at shippensburg college? The firm of Wi Cheetum and Howe. Source(s): He teacheth my hand to war; so a bow of steel is broken by mine arms. second Samuel 22:35 Are you searching for good criminal guard lawyer? In the event that so please talk it.

Great criminal guard lawful agent San Bernardino County?

Does anybody know a decent criminal guard lawyer in San Bernardino County. I involve one that isnt excessively costly, yet is good.its for a thievery case for my life partner. Much thanks to you to such an extent! Bernardino Criminal Defense Attorneys| San Bernardino, California … … E.

Blatt serve those in need of a guard lawyer inside… Have legal advisor (in the USA) succeeded contained by making TRULY blameworthy hoodlums honest? On the off chance that that is the attorneys job…would they truly venture to that degree of demonstrating an arraigned individual honest regardless of the possibility that the indicted individual REALLY HAS perpetrated a wrongdoing? Assuming this is the case, what’s that say in regards to our supported framework? “> Strange thing to ask amid a week in which a Texas…

Hi, would it say it is conceivable to be judge contained by a criminal skin when you dont own a promoter or a witness? Yes. The judge will clarify the results of your arrangements before he tries the case. On the off chance that you can’t manage the cost of a lawyer (and run over the criteria of not having the capacity to bear the cost of one) you could achieve an open protector assigned….
srey lok kloun 44

srey lok kloun 44

Why the Demand for Chiropractors Continues to Enhance

A few individuals don't find the significance of tending to their backs till they have encountered vertebral link wounds. Spine damage regularly alluded to as "SCI" by doctor allude to the harm that is made by injury, for example, car accidents, shots, and powerful drops notwithstanding specific sicknesses or disease including polio, ataxia, et cetera. These injury reason overwhelming harms to the spine prompting a loss of peculiarity like feeling or development.

As opposed to simply what numerous individuals accept, spine wounds are genuinely not quite the same as back wounds comprising of stenosis in the spinal area, circles that are broken, or nerves that are crushed. Simply what secures it separated is that the spine stays undamaged yet it couldn't have the capacity to truly feel as an aftereffect of the injury made by the harms. Nowadays, numerous are procuring helpless against having spine string wounds because of the way that they have somehow ended up inconsiderate and reckless brought by contemporary method for living.

Various people are furthermore coming to be helpless to creating sicknesses that may prompt spine link wounds following the environment is considerably more sullied which makes individuals defenseless bunches of conditions. Specialists say that there is a higher requirement for pros that would tend to distinctive parts of the body particularly in the bone and joint gadget. This is the reason progressively more people would surely want into the temporary fad of chiropractic and wind up being chiropractors.

Chiropractic professionals accept that for as protracted as there is inconvenience particularly in the spinal section or vertebrae area there would unquestionably dependably be a need for them. Since Dr. D.D. Palmer, the Daddy of Chiropractic technique uncovered its potential outcomes means in 1895 when he straightened out his beginning spine to have the capacity to oversee torment, extra people have seen its preferences and needed to get through it.

Since then, chiropractic pertinent administrations have been in need to people in different parts of the globe. On account of the proceeds with requirement for chiropractic specialists, much more and considerably more establishments have developed to teach people in diagnosing, overseeing and ensuring against the regular bone and joint inconveniences and additionally various issues in the restless gadget.

This is finished with the utilization of exceptional vertebral situating methodologies, gathering of back rub treatment and different routines required depending the on the level of torment or the reality of the issue. The variable why not very many appreciate chiropractic-related employments is that individuals ought to be qualified to carry out the employment. What's more this accreditation require not just the State and National Permit by passing a passing a formal assessment yet moreover have the capacity to complete all chiropractic instruction necessities from a trusted school that offers chiropractic projects.

Basically like in different occupations, having sufficient supply for chiropractors that would surely normally keep an eye on the necessities of people with vertebral link wounds would unquestionably infer that there need to be sufficient mixture of students that are taking chiropractic -related courses in universities. Getting capabilities from a dependable foundation to verify that there would positively be no clinical negligence one the understudy at last comes to be a chiropractic specialist. For those that might surely would want to come to be chiropractors, getting instruction is truly a need to because of the way that the expertise and preparing one will positively get from the organization will prepare them to do the work.

Numerous people don't find the benefit of dealing with their goes down until they have really experienced spinal line wounds. Spinal link damage commonly alluded to as "SCI" by restorative pros allude to the harms that is made by injury, for example, auto accidents, discharges, and substantial drops and also certain ailments or conditions including polio, ataxia, and so forth.

These injury reason enormous harms to the spinal link coming about to a loss of gimmick like sensation or portability. Much the same as in different callings, having sufficient supply for chiropractic professionals that would keep an eye on the necessities of people with spine link wounds would imply that there ought to be satisfactory number of students that are taking chiropractic consideration -related projects in schools.

On the off chance that you cherished this data and you would love to get more subtle elements identifying with health - pop over to this site - please visit the site.
louch thor pel ke pong much tek 34

louch thor pel ke pong much tek 34

As the criminal law in Arizona goes, when a criminal allegation is documented the case is brought to the courthouse for the pretrial hearing. This is precisely when you would be given an opportunity to give a request of blameworthy or may be not liable to the charges against you. It is hence fitting to counsel with an Arizona criminal lawyer, earlier your pretrial listening to so you can atleast settle on the right method for arguing.

That being said, according to criminal law Arizona, regardless of the possibility that there are charges made against you however you are honest till the time the proofs are not demonstrated. This is thusly the most obvious opportunity to demonstrate that you are not liable and you require the criminal barrier lawyer Phoenix to take of this. The criminal lawyer in Arizona has ended up sufficiently being useful and henceforth it has been perceived that individuals are really calling the government criminal barrier lawyers to take exhortation keeping in mind the end goal to let the criminal lawyer assess the proof and protect them in court and progressively.

By contracting the criminal guard lawyer in Arizona you will be in a superior position to have a expansive comprehension of the charges against you furthermore about the shifted criminal law (as it applies to your case), the particular state systems furthermore about the potential punishment which you could confront. Truth be told, the criminal law shifts from State to State consequently you require the criminal lawyer in Arizona who can promise you the adaptability to face the charges regardless of how grave the charge is.
louch thort vdo srey srat 29

louch thort vdo srey srat 29

Chapter Two Execution of Claims Having the Object of Monetary Payment
Section I. Attachable Property
379. (Principles)
Except where otherwise provided in this or another law, attachment can be carried out against all tangible and intangible property belonging to the debtor in execution.

380. (Property exempt from attachment)
The following property cannot be attached:
(a) clothing, bedding, furniture, kitchen appliances and house fittings that are indispensable for the daily living of the debtor in execution and his/her family living under the same roof;12

(b) foodstuffs and fuel sufficient for two months for the debtor in execution and his/her family living under the same roof;

(c) money or articles received by the debtor in execution from the central or local government pursuant to any livelihood, educational, medical or other welfare program;

(d) apart from the money prescribed in Item (c), money up to 1,000,000 riels;

(e) tools, fertilizer, domestic livestock and their feed that are necessary for the work of persons engaged predominantly in agriculture by their own labor, together with seeds and other agricultural products required in order to continue such work until the next harvest;

(f) nets and other fishing equipment, feed, young fish and other fishery products that are necessary for the work of catching or raising fish by persons engaged in fisheries predominantly by their own labor;

(g) tools and other objects that are necessary for the work of technicians, artisans laborers and other persons engaged in an occupation or business predominantly using their own intellectual or physical work; provided that objects that are held with the object of sale or lease can be attached;

(h) Buddha images, sacred books and other objects directly used in worship or religious ceremonies;

(i) genealogical records, diaries, trade books and similar objects required by the debtor in execution;

(j) objects commemorating awards or other honors received by the debtor in execution or a family member;

(k) books and other equipment necessary for study at a school or other educational institution by the debtor in execution or a family member residing under the same roof;

(l) an invention or work that has not yet been laid open;
(m) an artificial hand, leg, ear, eye or other prosthetic body part, or other thing necessary for nursing any sickness of the debtor in execution or a family member residing under the same roof; and

(n) fire fighting equipment, apparatus, escape apparatus and other equipment required to be installed by law for prevention of disaster and security of 12 Literally “the debtor and any cohabiting relative having a common livelihood with the debtor” buildings and other structures.

381. (Change of scope of exempt movables)
1. Upon motion, the court of first instance to which the bailiff belongs can cancel the whole or part of any attachment carried out by a bailiff, or permit the attachment of any movables listed in Article 380 (Property exempt from attachment), taking into account the living conditions of the debtor in execution and the creditor in execution and other circumstances.

2. If there has been a change of circumstances, the court of first instance to which the bailiff belongs can permit attachment of movables of which attachment has been cancelled under Paragraph 1, or order the cancellation of the whole or part of any attachment under said Paragraph.

3. Where a motion is filed seeking cancellation of attachment under Paragraphs 1 or
2, the court of first instance to which the bailiff belongs can order a stay of execution until such time as said ruling comes into force, with or without requiring the posting of security.

4. Chomtoah appeals can be filed against rulings dismissing motions under Paragraphs 1 or 2, or rulings permitting attachment under said provisions.

382. (Rights exempt from attachment (garnishment))
1. Salaries, wages and other rights in the nature of compensation for work shall only be attachable to the extent set forth below, in respect of the balance remaining after deduction of taxation and social insurance premiums from the amount receivable by the debtor in execution on the date of payment of such compensation:

(a) none of the amount up to the amount of 200,000 riels per month;

(b) one quarter of the amount exceeding 200,000 riels up to the amount of 600,000 riels per month;

(c) one third of the amount exceeding 600,000 riels up to the amount of 2,000,000 riels per month;

(d) one half of the amount exceeding 2,000,000 riels up to the amount of 4,000,000 riels per month;

(e) two thirds of the amount exceeding 4,000,000 riels up to the amount of 6,000,000 riels per month; and

(f) the whole of the amount exceeding 6,000,000 riels per month.

2. Rights to receive livelihood support, educational support, medical support or other support having the objective of protecting the livelihood of the debtor in execution cannot be attached.

383. (Change of scope of garnishment)
1. Upon motion, the execution court can cancel the whole or part of any attachment ruling, or make a ruling for attachment of any rights prohibited from being attached under Article 382 (Rights exempt from attachment (garnishment)), taking into account the living conditions of the debtor in execution and the creditor in execution and other circumstances.

2. If there has been a change of circumstances, the execution court, upon motion, can attach rights of which attachment has been cancelled under Paragraph 1, or cancel the whole or part of any attachment ruling under said Paragraph.

3. Where a motion is filed under Paragraphs 1 or 2, the execution court can order prohibition of payment or other performance by a third party debtor prescribed in Article 402 (Meaning of execution against claims and execution court) until such time as the ruling comes into force, with or without requiring the posting of security.

4. Chomtoah appeals can be filed against rulings dismissing motions seeking cancellation of execution rulings under Paragraphs 1 or 2.

For criminal attorney single 27

For criminal attorney single 27

For criminal attorney single?

as a fresher i was worn out seriously next following one year To take revenge from the senior who had torn me I brought a battle with him and softened his one limb up school premises.would i be rebuffed by law for lt. I have likewise grumbled to school key about ragging yet no clamor was taken Now…

Great supporter inside Florida to sue the DA for giving my social guarantee number to a criminal? Does anybody no a decent Attorney to contract for document a claim against the District Attorney contained by the STATE OF FLORIDA for passing my government disability number out by oversight to around four extraordinary crooks. Along alongside parcel’s of other touchy information..home…

Great and not costly criminal promoter encompassed by London, which one? Sorry, yet I understand you will find that great and shabby are not descriptive words connected with the legitimately perceived calling. a decent and not costly legal counselor and encompassed by london?? that is criminal ! legal counselors are lavish ! In case you’re searching for a decent yet modest legal counselor you truly need…

Great criminal promoter shippensburg dad?

who are some great no awesome criminal attorneys at shippensburg college? The firm of Wi Cheetum and Howe. Source(s): He teacheth my hand to war; so a bow of steel is broken by mine arms. second Samuel 22:35 Are you searching for good criminal guard lawyer? In the event that so please talk it.

Great criminal guard lawful agent San Bernardino County?

Does anybody know a decent criminal guard lawyer in San Bernardino County. I involve one that isnt excessively costly, yet is good.its for a thievery case for my life partner. Much thanks to you to such an extent! Bernardino Criminal Defense Attorneys| San Bernardino, California … … E.

Blatt serve those in need of a guard lawyer inside… Have legal advisor (in the USA) succeeded contained by making TRULY blameworthy hoodlums honest? On the off chance that that is the attorneys job…would they truly venture to that degree of demonstrating an arraigned individual honest regardless of the possibility that the indicted individual REALLY HAS perpetrated a wrongdoing? Assuming this is the case, what’s that say in regards to our supported framework? “> Strange thing to ask amid a week in which a Texas…

Hi, would it say it is conceivable to be judge contained by a criminal skin when you dont own a promoter or a witness? Yes. The judge will clarify the results of your arrangements before he tries the case. On the off chance that you can’t manage the cost of a lawyer (and run over the criteria of not having the capacity to bear the cost of one) you could achieve an open protector assigned….
k'mom prey pnhom 22

k'mom prey pnhom 22

Chapter Two COURT
Section I. Jurisdiction
7. (Meaning of court having jurisdiction)
A court having jurisdiction, shall mean a court that has the right to receive a complaint, adjudicate an action, and render a judgment.

1 "La Contradiction" is the principle of trial in which all opposing parties sit face to face and are provided an equal opportunity to present their legal or factual assertions.

8. (Jurisdiction conferred by address, etc.)
Actions against the following types of persons shall be brought in the court of first instance that has jurisdiction over the location indicated below:

(a) a natural person:
- [1] his/her domicile; [2] the location of residence, where such natural person does not have a domicile within Cambodia, or where his/her domicile is unknown; or [3] his/her last known domicile, where such natural person does not have a location of residence within Cambodia, or where the location of his/her residence is unknown.

(b) a Cambodian juridical person:
- [1] the location of its administrative headquarters or business office; or [2] the location of the domicile of the entity's representative or other principal person in charge of the operations of the entity, where there is no administrative headquarters or business office.

(c) a foreign juridical person
- [1] the location of the entity's administrative headquarters or business office in Cambodia; or [2] the location of the domicile of the entity's representative or other principal person in charge of the operations of the entity in Cambodia, where there is no administrative headquarters or business office within Cambodia.

9. (Jurisdiction based on property, etc.)
In addition to the courts specified in Article 8 (Jurisdiction conferred by address, etc.), the following types of actions may also be brought in the court having jurisdiction over the location set forth below:

(a) actions demanding performance of obligations:
- the location where the obligations are to be performed;
(b) actions demanding payment of money on bills or checks:
- the location where payment on the bill or check is to be made;
(c) actions demanding performance of obligations against persons who have no domicile in Cambodia, or those whose domicile is unknown:
- the location of the defendant's property which is the subject of the claim or security interest, or which may be seized;

(d) actions demanding performance of obligations against juridical persons that have no administrative headquarters or business office in Cambodia, or those whose administrative headquarters or business office is unknown:

- the location of the defendant's property which is the subject of the claim or security interest, or which may be seized;

(e) actions against persons having an administrative headquarters or business office and pertaining to business transacted therein:

- the location of the administrative headquarters or business office;
(f) actions based in tort:
- the location where the alleged tort occurred;

(g) actions pertaining to immovables:
- the location of the immovable;

(h) action pertaining to registration:
- the location at which the registration is required;

(i) actions pertaining to deceased's estate:
- the location of the domicile of the deceased at the time the inheritance commences, or if such person does not have a domicile in Cambodia or his/her domicile is unknown, the location of his/her residence, or if such person does not have a location of residence in Cambodia or his/her location of residence is unknown, the location of his/her last known domicile.

10. (Special jurisdiction in cases involving divorce, parent-child relationships)
1. An action for divorce or an action to confirm the existence or nonexistence of a parent-child relationship shall be heard exclusively by the court of first instance having jurisdiction over the location of the domicile of the person whose statue is related to the action.

2. Where the domicile described in Paragraph 1 is not within Cambodia, or where a domicile within Cambodia is not clear, the location of residence shall be used. Where there is no location of residence, or where such location of residence is unclear, the last known domicile shall be used.

11. (Jurisdiction over joint claims)
Where one action encompasses multiple claims that are subject to the jurisdiction of different courts, all claims may be brought in the court having jurisdiction over one of the claims.

12. (Designation of court having jurisdiction)
Where the court having jurisdiction cannot exercise its jurisdiction for any reason based in law or fact, or if the court having jurisdiction cannot be designated because the jurisdictional district is unclear, the Supreme Court shall, upon motion and by ruling, determine the court having jurisdiction.

13. (Jurisdiction by agreement)
1. An agreement that determines the court having jurisdiction shall be valid only where it is made between merchant(s) and/or juristic person(s) with regard to the court of first instance.

2. The agreement referred to in Paragraph 1 shall not be valid unless it pertains to an action based on a specific legal relationship and is made in writing.

14. (Jurisdiction as a result of failure to raise objection)
Where, at the court of first instance, the defendant makes statements on the merits at the court dates of the preparatory procedure for oral argument or offers argument on the merits at the court dates for oral argument without contesting jurisdiction, the court shall be deemed to have jurisdiction [over the case].

15. (Exception in case of statutory exclusive jurisdiction)
The provisions of Articles 13 (Jurisdiction by agreement) and 14 (Jurisdiction as a result of failure to raise objection) shall not apply to actions regarding which exclusive jurisdiction is conferred by law.

16. (Examination of evidence on court's own authority)
The court may examine evidence on its own authority in regard to matters relating to its jurisdiction.

17. (Time of determination of jurisdiction)
The jurisdiction of the court shall be determined as at the time when a complaint is filed.

18. (Handling of situations where jurisdiction does not exist)
1. Where the court determines that it lacks jurisdiction over all or part of an action, it shall transfer such action or part thereof to a court having jurisdiction, upon motion or on its own authority.

2. The motion for transfer shall be made in writing, except where it is made at a court date. Where such a motion is made, the reasons for the motion shall be clearly stated.

19. (Transfer to avoid delay, etc.)
1. A court of first instance may, even where an action falls under its jurisdiction, upon motion or on its own authority, transfer all or part of such action to another court having jurisdiction if it determines that such a transfer is necessary in order to avoid significant delay in the progress of the action, or in the interest of fairness to the parties. Such transfer shall take into account the location of the domiciles of the parties and the witnesses to be examined, the location of the objects to be inspected, and any other relevant matters.

2. Where a motion is made by a party pursuant to Paragraph 1, the court shall consider the opinion of the other party when making its ruling. When determining on its own authority to order a transfer pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 1, the court may consider the opinions of the parties.

20. (Restriction on transfer in case of exclusive jurisdiction)
The provisions of Article 19 (Transfer to avoid delay, etc.) shall not apply where the action falls by law under the exclusive jurisdiction of the court before which the action is pending.

21. (Chomtoah Appeal)
A Chomtoah appeal may be made against a ruling ordering a transfer or dismissing a motion to transfer.

22. (Binding effect, etc. of transfer ruling)
1. Where a ruling to transfer an action has become final and binding, the ruling shall be binding on the court to which the action has been transferred.

2. The court to which an action is transferred may not transfer the action to another court.

3. When a ruling to transfer an action has become final and binding, the action shall be deemed pending ab initio before the court to which it has been transferred.

4. When a ruling to transfer an action has become final and binding, the court issuing the ruling to transfer shall forward the record of the case to the court to which the action has been transferred.

khmer girl 17

khmer girl 17

Section III. Intervention/Participation
43. (Assisting intervention)
A third party having a legal interest in the outcome of litigation may participate in the litigation in order to assist one of the parties.

44. (Application for assisting intervention)
1. An application for assisting intervention shall state clearly the party on whose behalf the intervention is sought as well as the reasons for the intervention, and shall be made to the court in which acts of litigation based on intervention are to be conducted.

2. An application for assisting intervention may be made together with acts of litigation that can be conducted by an assisting intervenor.

45. (Objection to assisting intervention, etc.)
1. Where a party objects to an application for assisting intervention, the court shall decide, by ruling, whether to grant or deny the application. In such cases, the prospective assisting intervenor shall show to a preliminary showing the grounds for assisting intervention.

2. The objection referred to in Paragraph 1 may not be raised if such party has made statements during preparatory procedure for oral argument or has made argument during oral argument without raising the objection.
3. A Chomtoah appeal may be made against the ruling described in Paragraph 1.

46. (Acts of litigation by assisting intervenor)
1. An assisting intervenor may advance offensive or defensive measures, raise objections, file appeals, submit motions for retrial, or otherwise conduct any act of litigation in the action. However, this shall not apply to acts that cannot be conducted by the assisted party at the time intervention occurs.

2. An act of litigation conducted by an assisting intervenor shall be invalid if it is inconsistent with an act of litigation conducted by the assisted party.

3. An assisting intervenor may conduct acts of litigation, even where an objection has been raised to such intervention, until a decision denying intervention has become final and binding.

4. Where an act of litigation conducted by an assisting intervenor has been ratified by a party, such act shall be valid even where a decision denying intervention has become final and binding.

47. (Effect of judgment against assisting intervenor)
In an action that has been entered by an assisting intervenor, where a decision adverse to the assisted party has become final and binding, the assisting intervenor is bound by such decision as between the assisted party and the assisting intervenor, except in the following situations:

(a) where the assisting intervenor could not conduct acts of litigation due to the provisions of the second sentence of Paragraph 1 of Article 46 (Acts of litigation by assisting intervenor);
(b) where the acts of litigation conducted by the assisting intervenor were invalid due to the provisions of Paragraph 2 of Article 46 (Acts of litigation by assisting intervenor);
(c) where the assisted party obstructed the acts of litigation conducted by the assisting intervenor;
(d) where the assisted party intentionally or negligently failed to conduct acts of litigation that could not be conducted by the assisting intervenor.

48. (Application of joint litigation principles to a special type of assisting intervention)

1. Where the binding effect of a final judgment is to extend as between an assisting intervenor and the adversary party to the assisted party, the status of the assisting intervenor in the litigation shall be equivalent to that of a joint litigant under Article 41 (Rules regarding trial in compulsory joint litigation).

2. In cases described in Paragraph 1, the provisions of Paragraph 2 of Article 46 (Acts of litigation by assisting intervenor) and of subparagraphs (b) and (c) of Article 47 (Effect of judgment against assisting intervenor) shall not apply.

49. (Intervention as joint litigant)
1. Where the subject-matter of an action is to be determined only jointly between one of the parties and a third person, the third person may intervene in the action as a joint litigant.
2. The provisions of Article 44 (Application for assisting intervention) shall apply mutatis mutandis to applications for intervention under Paragraph 1.
3. Applications for intervention under Paragraph 1 shall be made in writing. 4. The written application described in Paragraph 3 shall be served on the other joint litigants and on the adversary party.

50. (Notice of action)
1. The parties to an action may, at any time, during the pendency of the action give notice of the action to third parties entitled to intervene.
2. Notice of an action shall be made by filing with the court a writing stating the grounds therefor and the current progress of the litigation. The court shall serve this writing on the persons who are to receive it and on the adversary party in the litigation.

3. Even where a person receiving notice of an action does not intervene therein, for purposes of the application of Article 47 (Effect of judgment against assisting intervenor), such person shall be deemed to have intervened at the time intervention became possible.

51. (Action against plaintiff and defendant as joint defendants)
1. A third person who alleges that all or part of the rights comprising the subject-matter of an action between other persons belong to such third person may, at any time during the pendency of the action, file a separate action against both parties to that action as joint defendants with the court of first instance in which the underlying action was filed.

2. Where a separate action is filed pursuant to Paragraph 1 while the underlying action is pending in the court of first instance, the court in which the action was filed may consolidate the two cases.

korea model cute slop 12

korea model cute slop 12

Section VI. Procedures for Distribution by Court
487. (Which court is to implement distribution)
The court to implement distribution shall be the court of first instance to which the bailiff belongs in the case of execution against movables, and the execution court in other cases.

488. (Preparations for distribution)
1. Upon the arising of any of the grounds described below, the court that is to carry out the distribution shall set a date for distribution and send notice of the date, time and place thereof to the creditors entitled to distribution and to the debtor:

(a) if in a case of execution against movables, the ground for deposit has been extinguished, in a case where there has been a report to a court under Paragraph 1 Article 400 (Deposit by bailiff with the court) or there has been a report under Article 401 (Report to court of first instance);

(b) if in a case of execution against a claim or other property rights, there has been a deposit (payment into court) under Article 412 (Collection Suits), a sale has been carried out pursuant to an order for sale under Article 413 (Ruling ordering sale) or the proceeds of sale have been submitted under Paragraph 2 of Article 414 (Execution of ruling of attachment of right to demand delivery of movables) ;

(c) if in a case of execution against an immovable, there has been payment of the sale price under Paragraph 1 of Article 447 (Payment of the price) or an application under the first sentence of Paragraph 3 of Article 447 (Payment of the price) has been made and a ruling permitting sale has become final and binding; or

(d) if in a case of execution against a vessel, there has been payment of the sale price under Article 479 (Payment of the price).

2. When the date of distribution has been fixed, the court clerk shall send a notice to each creditor to submit within one week, to the court that is to carry out the distribution, a statement of accounts indicating the principal of the claim, the interest until the date of distribution and the amount of execution costs.

489. (Implementation of distribution)
1. The court charged with distribution shall implement distribution in accordance with the distribution schedule in cases prescribed in Paragraph 1 of Article 488 (Preparations for distribution); provided that it shall not be necessary to follow the distribution schedule in cases prescribed in Paragraph 2.

2. If there is only one creditor, or where there are two or more creditors but the amount to be appropriated to distribution is sufficient to satisfy the claim of each creditor and the whole of the execution costs, the court responsible for distribution shall effect distribution to the creditor or creditors and deliver any surplus to the debtor in execution.

3. If after the time for distribution has arrived a document listed in Items (a) to (g) of Paragraph 1 of Article 370 (Stay and cancellation of execution) is filed, and there are creditors entitled to distribution other than the creditor(s) in execution, the court charged with distribution shall effect distribution to such creditors.

4. Even if after the time for distribution has arrived a document listed in Items (a) or (b) of Paragraph 2 of Article 370 (Stay and cancellation of execution) is filed, the court charged with distribution shall carry out distribution to such creditors.

490. (Preparation of distribution schedule)
1. The court responsible for distribution shall prepare a distribution schedule on the date of distribution except as providing in Paragraph 2 of Article 489 (Implementation of distribution).

2. On the date of distribution, the court shall summon the creditors in execution set forth below, together with the debtor(s) in execution:
(a) Execution against movables Creditors prescribed in Article 398 (Scope of creditors entitled to distribution)

(b) Execution against claims and other property rights Creditors prescribed in Article 415 (Scope of creditors eligible for distribution)

(c) Execution against immovables Creditors prescribed in Article 453 (The scope of creditors entitled to distribution)

(d) Execution against vessel Creditors prescribed in Article 486 (The scope of creditors entitled to distribution)

3. For the purpose of preparing the distribution schedule, the court shall examine the creditors and debtor(s) in execution who appear at court on the date of distribution, and shall verify such documentary evidence as can be verified on the spot.

4. The claim principal, the interest and other incidental claims, amount of execution costs, priority of distribution and amount shall be noted alongside the following amounts:

(a) Execution against movables Amount of proceeds of sale of attached articles and amount of money attached

(b) Execution against claims and other property rights Amount to be distributed

(c) Execution against immovables Amount of proceeds of sale
(d) Execution against vessel Amount of sale price
5. The priority and amount of distribution prescribed in Paragraph 4 shall be recorded in accordance with the agreement of all the creditors on the date of distribution, if such agreement is achieved, and in other cases in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code, Commercial Code or other relevant law.

6. For the purposes of distribution, claims subject to a certain time stipulation which have not matured shall be deemed to have matured.

491. (Objection to entry in distribution table)
1. Any creditor, or any debtor in execution, who is dissatisfied with the claims of creditors or the amounts for distribution noted in a distribution table, may state an objection on the date of distribution.

2. The court responsible for implementing the distribution shall proceed to distribution of that portion of the distribution table to which there is no objection.

3. If a creditor in execution or creditor who has submitted a demand for distribution by virtue of an authenticated copy of enforceable title of execution receives payment of the whole of his/her claim, the debtor in execution may demand that the court clerk deliver up to him/her the authenticated copy of enforceable title of execution submitted by such creditor.

4. Where the case has finished, in circumstances other those described in Paragraph 3, the creditor described therein may demand that the court clerk deliver up to him/her the authenticated copy of enforceable title of execution; provided that if such creditor receives partial payment of his/her claim, the court clerk shall note such amount on the authenticated copy prior to delivering it up.

492. (Suit of objection by creditor who has stated an objection to the contents of a distribution table)
1. A creditor who has stated an objection to any entry in a distribution table shall file a suit of objection to such entry, naming the other party to the motion of objection as the defendant.

2. The court that is to effect the distribution shall have jurisdiction over suits described in Paragraph 1.

3. Unless a creditor who has stated an objection to an entry in a distribution table proves, not later than one week following the date of distribution, that the creditor has filed a suit described in Paragraph 1, the objection shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

4. If a court finds in its judgment in a suit under Paragraph 1 that the objection is well founded, it shall cancel the distribution table in order that an amended or new distribution table may be prepared.

493. (Suit of objection by debtor in execution to contents of table of distribution)
1. A debtor in execution who has stated an objection to any entry in a distribution table against a creditor holding an authenticated copy of enforceable title of execution shall file a suit of objection to claim, naming the creditor who is the other party to the motion of objection as the defendant.

2. A debtor in execution who has stated an objection to any entry in a distribution table against a creditor who does not hold an authenticated copy of enforceable title of execution shall file a suit of objection to distribution, naming the creditor who is the other party to the motion of objection as the defendant.

3. The court that is to effect the distribution shall have jurisdiction over suits described in Paragraph 2.

4. Unless not later than one week following the date of distribution, a debtor in execution who has stated an objection to an entry in a distribution table proves the filing of a suit described in Paragraph 1 and files an authenticated copy of a decision staying execution by virtue of such suit, or proves the filing of a suit described in Paragraph 2, the objection shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

5. If the court that is to execute the distribution finds in its judgment under Paragraph 2 that the objection is well founded, it shall cancel the table of distribution in order to amend it or prepare a new table.

494. (Retention of amount of distribution)
1. If any of the following grounds applies to a claim to which a creditor is entitled, the court that is to implement the distribution shall retain such amount:

(a) the claim is subject to a condition precedent or uncertain time stipulation;
(b) the claim belongs to a provisional attachment creditor;
(c) a document listed in Paragraph 2, Item (a) of Article 370 (Stay and cancellation of execution) has been submitted;

(d) an authenticated copy of a decision temporarily enjoining the exercise of a lien, pledge or hypothec relating to the claim has been submitted; and/or

(e) a suit of objection to an entry in a distribution table has been filed under Paragraph 1 of Article 492 (Suit of objection by creditor who has stated an objection to the contents of a distribution table) or Paragraph 2 of Article 493 (Suit of objection by debtor in execution to contents of table of distribution).

2. The court that is to execute the distribution shall retain the amount of distribution to any creditor who fails to appear at the court to receive such distribution.

495. (Implementation of distribution upon confirmation of rights, etc.)
1. If the ground of retention of distribution under Paragraph 1 of Article 494 (Retention of amount of distribution) disappears, the court that is to implement distribution shall proceed to distribute the retained money.

2. Where distribution is to be carried out under Paragraph 1, the court that is to implement distribution shall alter the distribution table even on behalf of creditors who have not stated an objection to an entry in the distribution table in the following cases:

(a) if it is no longer possible to make a distribution to a creditor whose distribution has been retained for a cause described in Items (a) through (d) of Paragraph 1 of Article 494 (Retention of amount of distribution);and/or

(b) if a creditor whose distribution has been retained for a reason described in Item (e) of Paragraph 1 of Article 494(Retention of amount of distribution) loses in a suit of objection to an entry in the distribution table filed by the debtor in execution under Paragraph 2 of Article 493 (Suit of objection by debtor in execution to contents of table of distribution).
cute girl clip10

cute girl clip10

Sub-section II. Terms of sale
430. (Valuation)
1. The execution court shall appoint a valuer and order a valuation of the immovable, based on examination of its configuration, occupancy and other existing circumstances.

2. The valuer must obtain the permission of the execution court in order to request the assistance of the bailiff pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Article 338 (Ensuring performance of duties by bailiffs, etc.)

3. When carrying out an examination for the purpose of valuation, the valuer may enter the immovable, question the debtor in execution or other third party in possession thereof and/or request the presentation of documents by said persons.

4. A bailiff whose assistance has been requested by a valuer under Paragraph 2 of Article 338 (Ensuring performance of duties by bailiffs, etc.) may take the necessary measures to open locked doors if required in cases where the valuer enters immovable pursuant to Paragraph 3.

5. The valuer shall report in writing to the execution court the results of examination of the immovable and its valuation.

431. (Rights which remain in existence after sale and rights which are extinguished)

1. Real security interests, usufructuary real rights and leases on the immovable that can be asserted against attachment by the creditor in execution shall remain in effect after sale.

2. Interests in the immovable other than those prescribed in Paragraph 1 shall be extinguished by sale.

3. Any attachment, execution of provisional attachment or provisional disposition relating to the immovable which cannot be asserted against the creditor in execution or provisional attachment creditor will lapse upon sale.

4. If an interested person gives notice by the time of the fixing of the minimum sale price [to the execution court] that an agreement deviating from the provisions of Paragraphs 1 and 2 has been made, such agreement shall govern all changes in interests in the immovable arising from the sale.

432. (Determination of minimum sale price, etc.)
1. The execution court shall determine the minimum sale price on the basis of the valuation by the valuer.

2. Where it deems necessary, the execution court may change the minimum sale price.

433. (Sale of immovable as undivided whole)
The execution court may decide to conduct a sale of a number of immovable properties as undivided whole, if it deems reasonable to have the same purchaser to purchase them together in light of mutual use of such properties, even if the properties have different creditors in execution or debtors in execution, provided that if the whole of the claims of the creditors in execution and execution costs are likely to be satisfied by the minimum sale price of a portion of the properties for which a ruling of commencement of compulsory sale has been made on the basis of a single motion, this provision shall apply only in cases where the debtor, or debtors, as the case may be, consents or consent.

434. (Specifications of property)
1. The execution court shall draw up specifications and keep a copy of such specifications together with the valuer’s valuation report available for public inspection at the court. The specifications shall include following items:

(a) a description of the immovable; and
(b) interests in the land that will remain in force after sale in accordance with Article 431 (Rights which remain in existence after sale and rights which are extinguished) Paragraph 1 and execution of provisional disposition that will not lapse upon sale.

2. The execution court may, if it deems necessary in order to prepare the specification provided in the Paragraph 1, order a bailiff to examine configuration, occupancy, structures of a building(s) in case a building(s) exist or subject matter of the execution is a building, and other existing circumstances, and to report the results of the examination in writing.

3. A bailiff has the same authority as that of a valuer provided in the Paragraph 3 of Article 430 (Valuation) when the bailiff examines the existing conditions of the immovable property according to the order provided in the Paragraph 2.

435. (Measures to be taken if there is likely to be a deficit)
1. If the execution court finds that that a surplus is unlikely to arise after paying the procedural costs out of the minimum sale price of the immovable, the court shall notify the creditor in execution to this effect.

2. The execution court must cancel the compulsory sale proceedings based on the motion of the execution creditor when the execution creditor fails to perform the following actions:

(a) to make an offer [to the execution court] to buy him/herself in a fixed amount if there is no offer to purchase [by any other person] that reaches the said fixed amount, provided that the offer must be made within a week after receiving the notice described in Paragraph 1, and the said fixed amount must exceed the estimated amount of procedural costs; and (b) to provide a guarantee in the amount offered.

Very cute girl - vdoz9

Very cute girl - vdoz9

Section V. Execution against Vessels
454. (Meaning of vessels, etc.)
1. In this chapter, the term "vessels" refers to vessels having a gross tonnage of 20 tons or more.

2. In this Book and in Book Ⅶ, "certificate of registry of the vessel, etc." refers to the document evidencing the vessel's nationality and other documents necessary for the vessel lawfully to sail.

455. (Motion and method of execution against vessels)
1. Execution against a vessel shall be carried out by means of auction by the execution court.

2. In addition to the matters prescribed in Paragraph 2 of Article 439 (Determination of highest bidder, etc.), a motion for execution against a vessel shall include the location of the vessel and the name and current location of the captain.

3. The motion under Paragraph 2 shall be accompanied by an authenticated copy of the enforceable title of execution, together with:

(a) a certified copy of the register, in the case of a registered Cambodian vessel; and/or

(b) a document proving that the vessel is a vessel provided in Paragraph 1 of Article 454 (Meaning of vessels, etc.) in the case of non-registered Cambodian vessel or a non-Cambodian vessel and that the vessel is owned by the debtor in execution.

456. (Execution court)
The court of first instance having jurisdiction over the place in which the vessel is located at the time of ruling of commencement of auction shall be the execution court for execution against a vessel.

457. (Ruling of commencement of auction, etc.)
1. In order to commence auction proceedings, the execution court shall issue a ruling of commencement of auction and order the bailiff to confiscate the certificate of registry of the vessel, etc., and submit the same to the execution court.

2. The ruling of commencement under Paragraph 1 shall include a declaration of attachment of the vessel on behalf of the creditor in execution, together with an injunction against the debtor in execution leaving port.

3. The ruling of commencement under Paragraph 1 shall be served on the debtor in execution.

4. Upon the issue of a ruling of commencement under Paragraph 1 in respect of a registered Cambodian vessel, the court clerk shall immediately direct the registrar to record the attachment under such ruling.

5. The effect of the attachment shall arise upon service under Paragraph 3, provided that if registration of the attachment is carried out prior to the issue of the ruling of commencement of auction, said effect shall arise at the time of such registration.

6. If the bailiff confiscates the certificate of registry of the vessel, etc. prior to service of the ruling of commencement of auction or the registration of the attachment, the effect of the attachment shall arise from the time of such confiscation.

7. A Chomtoah appeal may be made against a ruling dismissing a motion for auction.

458. (Final date for demands for distribution and change thereof)
1. If attachment has come into effect under a ruling of commencement of auction, the execution court shall determine the final date for submission of demands for distribution.

2. If no ruling permitting sale has been made within 3 months following the final date for submission of demands for distribution, the execution court may change such final date.

459. (Ruling ordering delivery of certificate of registry, etc. prior to motion)
1. If it is likely that it would be extremely difficult to execute against a vessel unless the certificate of registry, etc. is confiscated prior to the motion for execution against such vessel, the court of first instance having its jurisdiction over the place where the registration of the vessel is made, upon motion, may by ruling order the debtor in execution to deliver up the bailiff the certificate of registry, etc. of the vessel. In cases where the vessel has not been registered or in cases of emergency, the court having jurisdiction over the location of the vessel may issue such a ruling.

2. When filing a motion under Paragraph 1 an authenticated copy of the enforceable title of execution must be presented and the grounds prescribed in the said Paragraph must be proved.

3. A ruling under Paragraph 1 shall be served on the debtor in execution.
4. A Chomtoah appeal may be filed against a ruling under Paragraph 1.
5. A ruling under Paragraph 1 ordering the delivery up of a vessel's nationality certificate, etc. to the bailiff can be enforced even before it is served on the other party. The costs of such execution shall be treated as common service costs of the auction proceedings.

6. A ruling under Paragraph 1 ordering the delivery up of a vessel's nationality certificate, etc. to the bailiff shall be enforced after two weeks have passed from the giving of notice thereof to the creditor in execution.

7. Unless the creditor in execution submits documentary evidence of the filing of a motion for execution against the vessel within 5 days of the delivery up to the bailiff of the certificate of registry, etc., the bailiff shall return the certificate of registry, etc. to the debtor in execution.

460. (Appointment of custodian, etc.)
1. Upon motion by the creditor in execution, where it deems necessary, the execution court may appoint a custodian of a vessel for which a ruling of commencement of auction has been issued.

2. The execution court shall supervise the custodian, who shall perform his/her duties with the care of a good manager. When the custodian completes his/her mandate he/she shall submit a report of account to the execution court without delay.

3. The custodian may be paid in advance the costs required for custody of the vessel as determined by the ruling of the execution court. The costs and remuneration required by the custodian for custody of the vessel shall be treated as Procedural Costs.

4. A Chomtoah appeal may be made against the ruling on a motion under Paragraph 1 and a ruling under Paragraph 3.

461. (Cancellation of auction procedures by reason of provision of guarantee)
1. If any document listed in Paragraph 2 of Article 370 (Stay and cancellation of execution) is submitted in connection with the claim of the creditor in execution, and the debtor in execution provides a guarantee equivalent to the total amount of the claims of the creditor in execution and the creditors who have submitted demands for distribution together with the Execution costs prior to the making of an offer to purchase, the execution court, upon motion, shall cancel the auction proceedings, with the exception of the distribution proceedings. If the guarantee is provided prior to the final date for submission of demands for distribution, it will suffice if the amount of the guarantee is equivalent to the total amount of the claims of the creditor in execution and the creditors who have submitted demands for distribution by that time together with the Execution costs.

2. If a stay of execution by reason of submission of a document described in Paragraph 1 lapses, the execution court shall effect distribution of the guarantee provided under said Paragraph to the creditors.

3. A Chomtoah appeal may be made against a ruling dismissing a motion under Paragraph 1.

4. The terms of Article 71 (Method of providing security and change in security) and Article 72 (Rights of person receiving provision of security) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the provision of security under Paragraph 1.

462. (Permission to sail)
1. The execution court may, upon motion of the debtor in execution, grant permission for the vessel to sail if the execution court finds that business necessity or other good grounds exist, and with the consent of each creditor and the highest bidder or the purchaser as the case may be.

2. A Chomtoah appeal may be made against a ruling on a motion under Paragraph 1. 3. A ruling under Paragraph 1 shall have no effect until it becomes final and binding.

463. (Transfer of case)
If a vessel in respect of which a ruling of commencement of auction has been issued has been moved to a location outside the jurisdiction of the execution court, the court may transfer the case to the court of first instance with jurisdiction over the location of the vessel.

464. (Cancellation of auction procedures in cases where certificate of registry, etc. cannot be confiscated)

If the bailiff is unable to confiscate the vessel's certificate of registry, etc. within 2 weeks after the issue of the ruling of commencement of auction, the execution court shall cancel the auction procedures.

465. (Cancellation of auction procedures by reason of destruction or loss of vessel, etc.)
Where there are clear circumstances preventing the conveyance of the vessel through sale, such as destruction or loss thereof, the execution court shall cancel the auction procedures.

466. (Request for striking off of registration of attachment)
1. In cases where the motion for auction is withdrawn, or a ruling of cancellation of auction procedures comes into effect, the court clerk shall direct the registrar to strike off the registration of the attachment under the relevant ruling of commencement.

2. The cost of the request for striking off under Paragraph 1 shall be borne by the creditor in execution who has withdrawn his/her motion, or by the creditor in execution who is subject to the ruling of cancellation.

467. (Valuation)
1. The execution court may appoint a valuer and order a valuation of the vessel.
2. The valuer must obtain the permission of the execution court in order to request the assistance of the bailiff pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Article 338 (Ensuring performance of duties by bailiffs, etc.).

3. When carrying out an examination for the purpose of valuation, the valuer may board the vessel, question the debtor in execution or other third party in possession of the vessel and/or request the submission of documents by said persons.

4. A bailiff whose assistance has been requested under Paragraph 2 of Article 338 (Ensuring performance of duties by bailiffs, etc.) may take the necessary measures to open locked doors if required in cases where the valuer boards a vessel pursuant to Paragraph 3.

468. (Determination of minimum sale price)
1. The execution court shall determine the minimum sale price on the basis of the valuation by the valuer.

2. Where it deems necessary, the execution court may change the minimum sale price.

3. Article 435 (Measures to be taken if there is likely to be a deficit) the provisions shall apply mutatis mutandis for execution against vessel.

469. (Method of sale, etc.)
1. Sale of the vessel shall be by tender or auction or such other method as may be prescribed by the execution court.

2. In the case of sale by tender or auction, the execution court shall set the date, time and place of sale, and have the bailiff carry out the sale.

3. In the case of sale under Paragraph 2, the court clerk shall give public notice with a description of the vessel to be sold, the minimum sale price and the date, time and place of sale.

4. In the case of sales under Paragraph 2, Article 396 (Maintenance of order in the sale premises) shall apply mutatis mutandis.

470. (Guarantee of offer to purchase)
1. Any person wishing to offer to purchase a vessel shall provide a guarantee in the amount equivalent to 10 percent of the minimum sale price, provided that the execution court may set a guarantee that exceeds this amount when it finds appropriate.

2. On request by a person other than the highest bidder, the execution court shall promptly return the guarantee prescribed under Paragraph 1 after the sale has been completed pursuant to Article 469 (Method of sale, etc.).

471. (Prohibition of offer to purchase by debtor in execution)
No debtor in execution shall be entitled to make an offer to purchase a vessel.

472. (Date for ruling of sale)

1. The execution court shall set a date for the purpose of ruling on sale and shall declare whether to permit or to refuse to permit the sale.

2. If the execution court has set a date for ruling on sale, the execution court must give notice to that effect to the persons with a relationship of interest.

473. (Statements of opinion concerning permission or refusal to permit sale)
Persons having an interest in the permission or refusal of permission for sale of the vessel may state their opinions on the date for ruling of sale concerning any grounds listed in Paragraph 2 of Article 474 (Permission or refusal of permission for sale) that affect their rights.

474. (Permission or refusal of permission for sale)
1. Except in cases described in Paragraph 2, the execution court shall issue a ruling permitting sale.

2. Where any of following grounds is found, the execution court must issue a finding refusing permission for sale:

(a) the auction proceedings should not be commenced or continued;
(b) the highest bidder is not qualified or incapable of purchasing the vessel, or its representative is not authorized to purchase the vessel;

(c) an application is made for refusal of permission for sale under Paragraph 1 of Article 476 (Application for refusal of permission for sale in a case where the vessel has been damaged, etc.);

(d) there is a serious error in the procedure for ruling of minimum sale price; and/or

(e) there is a serious error in the sale procedures.

475. (Chomtoah appeal against ruling permitting or refusing to permit sale)
1. An interested party may file a Chomtoah appeal against a ruling permitting or refusing to permit a sale, but only in cases where such party's rights would be infringed by such ruling.

2. A Chomtoah appeal against a ruling permitting sale must cite the existence of one of the grounds listed in Paragraph 2 of the 6 Article 474 (Permission or refusal of permission for sale) or of a serious error in the procedures of the ruling permitting the sale.

3. If it deems necessary, the Chomtoah appeal court may designate a respondent to the Chomtoah appellant.

4. A ruling permitting or refusing to permit a sale shall only become effective after it becomes final and binding.

476. (Application for refusal of permission for sale in a case where the vessel has been damaged, etc.)
1. If a vessel is seriously damaged by reason of natural disaster or other cause not attributable to fault on the part of the highest bidder or purchaser after the making of an offer to purchase, said highest bidder or purchaser may file a motion for disallowance of the sale prior to a ruling permitting sale being handed down, and for cancellation of such ruling if it has already been issued, until the time of payment of the price.

2. A Chomtoah appeal may be filed against a ruling on a motion for cancellation of a ruling allowing sale under Paragraph 1.

3. A ruling upon motion under Paragraph 1 canceling a ruling permitting sale shall not become effective until it becomes final and effective.

477. (Withdrawal of motion for auction after making of offer to purchase)
In order to withdraw a motion for auction after making an offer to purchase, a creditor in execution must obtain the consent of the highest bidder or purchaser as the case may be.

478. (Deadline for Payment of Price)
If the ruling permitting sale has become final and binding, the execution court shall promptly stipulate a deadline for payment of the price, and notify the purchaser thereof.

479. (Payment of the price)
1. When a ruling permitting sale becomes final and binding, the purchaser must pay the price to the execution court within the period stipulated by that court pursuant to Article 478 (Deadline for Payment of Price).

2. The money paid by the purchaser as guarantee of its offer to purchase shall be applied to payment of the price.

480. (Time of acquisition of vessel)
The purchaser acquires the vessel at the time of payment of the price.

481. (Effect of non-payment of price)
1. If the purchaser does not pay the price, the ruling permitting sale shall lapse. In such a case, the purchaser shall have no right to demand return of the guarantee paid under Article 470 (Guarantee of offer to purchase).

2. In the event of Paragraph 1, the execution court must once again execute an auction.

3. The Purchaser set forth in Paragraph 1 cannot make an offer to purchase under an auction as prescribed in Paragraph 2.

482. (Request for registration based on payment of price)
1. Upon payment of the price by the purchaser, the court clerk shall direct the noting and striking off of the following matters in the register:

(a) the noting of the transfer of the rights acquired by the purchaser; and
(b) the striking off of the attachment or provisional attachment.
2. The direction to the registrar under Paragraph 1 shall be accompanied by an authenticated copy of the ruling permitting sale.

3. The costs of the request under Paragraph 1 shall be borne by the purchaser.

483. (Ruling ordering delivery up of vessel)
1. Upon motion by a purchaser who has paid the price, the execution court may issue a ruling ordering the debtor in execution or a person in possession of the vessel to deliver up the vessel to the purchaser, provided that this shall not apply in the case of a person who the court finds is in possession on the basis of title that prevails over the title of the purchaser according to the case record.

2. The purchaser cannot file a motion under Paragraph 1 after the lapse of 6 months from the date of payment of the price.

3. In the case of a ruling under Paragraph 1 against persons in possession other than the debtor in execution, the execution court shall examine such other person.

4. A Chomtoah appeal may be filed against a ruling on a motion under Paragraph 1.
5. A ruling under Paragraph 1 shall not come into effect until it becomes final and binding.

484. (Sale price)
The sale price to be applied to distribution shall consist of the following:
(a) the price of the vessel; and/or
(b) any guarantee the return of which cannot be demanded under the second sentence of Article 481 (Effect of non-payment of price).

485. (Demand for distribution)
1. The persons listed below are entitled to make a demand for distribution:
(a) creditors holding an authenticated copy of a title of execution who are entitled to effect execution in accordance with Paragraph 1 of Article 354 (Requirement for execution clause and which organs grant such clause);

(b) creditors who have registered provisional attachment after registration of attachment based on a ruling of commencement of auction;

(c) creditors who have effected execution using the method of confiscation of the vessel's certificate of registry, etc.; and/or

(d) persons with documentary evidence of general liens or liens over the vessel.
2. A Chomtoah appeal may be filed against a ruling dismissing a demand for distribution.

486. (The scope of creditors entitled to distribution)
The creditors listed below shall be entitled to distribution of the sale price:
(a) the attachment creditor(s);
(b) creditors who have made a demand for distribution not later than the last date for submission of demands for distribution; and/or

(c) creditors who have registered provisional attachment prior to registration of attachment based on a ruling of commencement of auction.
kh girl kikilu at ptes somnak -z4

kh girl kikilu at ptes somnak -z4

Section V. Execution against Vessels
454. (Meaning of vessels, etc.)
1. In this chapter, the term "vessels" refers to vessels having a gross tonnage of 20 tons or more.

2. In this Book and in Book Ⅶ, "certificate of registry of the vessel, etc." refers to the document evidencing the vessel's nationality and other documents necessary for the vessel lawfully to sail.

455. (Motion and method of execution against vessels)
1. Execution against a vessel shall be carried out by means of auction by the execution court.

2. In addition to the matters prescribed in Paragraph 2 of Article 439 (Determination of highest bidder, etc.), a motion for execution against a vessel shall include the location of the vessel and the name and current location of the captain.

3. The motion under Paragraph 2 shall be accompanied by an authenticated copy of the enforceable title of execution, together with:

(a) a certified copy of the register, in the case of a registered Cambodian vessel; and/or

(b) a document proving that the vessel is a vessel provided in Paragraph 1 of Article 454 (Meaning of vessels, etc.) in the case of non-registered Cambodian vessel or a non-Cambodian vessel and that the vessel is owned by the debtor in execution.

456. (Execution court)
The court of first instance having jurisdiction over the place in which the vessel is located at the time of ruling of commencement of auction shall be the execution court for execution against a vessel.

457. (Ruling of commencement of auction, etc.)
1. In order to commence auction proceedings, the execution court shall issue a ruling of commencement of auction and order the bailiff to confiscate the certificate of registry of the vessel, etc., and submit the same to the execution court.

2. The ruling of commencement under Paragraph 1 shall include a declaration of attachment of the vessel on behalf of the creditor in execution, together with an injunction against the debtor in execution leaving port.

3. The ruling of commencement under Paragraph 1 shall be served on the debtor in execution.

4. Upon the issue of a ruling of commencement under Paragraph 1 in respect of a registered Cambodian vessel, the court clerk shall immediately direct the registrar to record the attachment under such ruling.

5. The effect of the attachment shall arise upon service under Paragraph 3, provided that if registration of the attachment is carried out prior to the issue of the ruling of commencement of auction, said effect shall arise at the time of such registration.

6. If the bailiff confiscates the certificate of registry of the vessel, etc. prior to service of the ruling of commencement of auction or the registration of the attachment, the effect of the attachment shall arise from the time of such confiscation.

7. A Chomtoah appeal may be made against a ruling dismissing a motion for auction.

458. (Final date for demands for distribution and change thereof)
1. If attachment has come into effect under a ruling of commencement of auction, the execution court shall determine the final date for submission of demands for distribution.

2. If no ruling permitting sale has been made within 3 months following the final date for submission of demands for distribution, the execution court may change such final date.

459. (Ruling ordering delivery of certificate of registry, etc. prior to motion)
1. If it is likely that it would be extremely difficult to execute against a vessel unless the certificate of registry, etc. is confiscated prior to the motion for execution against such vessel, the court of first instance having its jurisdiction over the place where the registration of the vessel is made, upon motion, may by ruling order the debtor in execution to deliver up the bailiff the certificate of registry, etc. of the vessel. In cases where the vessel has not been registered or in cases of emergency, the court having jurisdiction over the location of the vessel may issue such a ruling.

2. When filing a motion under Paragraph 1 an authenticated copy of the enforceable title of execution must be presented and the grounds prescribed in the said Paragraph must be proved.

3. A ruling under Paragraph 1 shall be served on the debtor in execution.
4. A Chomtoah appeal may be filed against a ruling under Paragraph 1.
5. A ruling under Paragraph 1 ordering the delivery up of a vessel's nationality certificate, etc. to the bailiff can be enforced even before it is served on the other party. The costs of such execution shall be treated as common service costs of the auction proceedings.

6. A ruling under Paragraph 1 ordering the delivery up of a vessel's nationality certificate, etc. to the bailiff shall be enforced after two weeks have passed from the giving of notice thereof to the creditor in execution.

7. Unless the creditor in execution submits documentary evidence of the filing of a motion for execution against the vessel within 5 days of the delivery up to the bailiff of the certificate of registry, etc., the bailiff shall return the certificate of registry, etc. to the debtor in execution.

460. (Appointment of custodian, etc.)
1. Upon motion by the creditor in execution, where it deems necessary, the execution court may appoint a custodian of a vessel for which a ruling of commencement of auction has been issued.

2. The execution court shall supervise the custodian, who shall perform his/her duties with the care of a good manager. When the custodian completes his/her mandate he/she shall submit a report of account to the execution court without delay.

3. The custodian may be paid in advance the costs required for custody of the vessel as determined by the ruling of the execution court. The costs and remuneration required by the custodian for custody of the vessel shall be treated as Procedural Costs.

4. A Chomtoah appeal may be made against the ruling on a motion under Paragraph 1 and a ruling under Paragraph 3.

461. (Cancellation of auction procedures by reason of provision of guarantee)
1. If any document listed in Paragraph 2 of Article 370 (Stay and cancellation of execution) is submitted in connection with the claim of the creditor in execution, and the debtor in execution provides a guarantee equivalent to the total amount of the claims of the creditor in execution and the creditors who have submitted demands for distribution together with the Execution costs prior to the making of an offer to purchase, the execution court, upon motion, shall cancel the auction proceedings, with the exception of the distribution proceedings. If the guarantee is provided prior to the final date for submission of demands for distribution, it will suffice if the amount of the guarantee is equivalent to the total amount of the claims of the creditor in execution and the creditors who have submitted demands for distribution by that time together with the Execution costs.

2. If a stay of execution by reason of submission of a document described in Paragraph 1 lapses, the execution court shall effect distribution of the guarantee provided under said Paragraph to the creditors.

3. A Chomtoah appeal may be made against a ruling dismissing a motion under Paragraph 1.

4. The terms of Article 71 (Method of providing security and change in security) and Article 72 (Rights of person receiving provision of security) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the provision of security under Paragraph 1.

462. (Permission to sail)
1. The execution court may, upon motion of the debtor in execution, grant permission for the vessel to sail if the execution court finds that business necessity or other good grounds exist, and with the consent of each creditor and the highest bidder or the purchaser as the case may be.

2. A Chomtoah appeal may be made against a ruling on a motion under Paragraph 1. 3. A ruling under Paragraph 1 shall have no effect until it becomes final and binding.

463. (Transfer of case)
If a vessel in respect of which a ruling of commencement of auction has been issued has been moved to a location outside the jurisdiction of the execution court, the court may transfer the case to the court of first instance with jurisdiction over the location of the vessel.

464. (Cancellation of auction procedures in cases where certificate of registry, etc. cannot be confiscated)

If the bailiff is unable to confiscate the vessel's certificate of registry, etc. within 2 weeks after the issue of the ruling of commencement of auction, the execution court shall cancel the auction procedures.

465. (Cancellation of auction procedures by reason of destruction or loss of vessel, etc.)
Where there are clear circumstances preventing the conveyance of the vessel through sale, such as destruction or loss thereof, the execution court shall cancel the auction procedures.

466. (Request for striking off of registration of attachment)
1. In cases where the motion for auction is withdrawn, or a ruling of cancellation of auction procedures comes into effect, the court clerk shall direct the registrar to strike off the registration of the attachment under the relevant ruling of commencement.

2. The cost of the request for striking off under Paragraph 1 shall be borne by the creditor in execution who has withdrawn his/her motion, or by the creditor in execution who is subject to the ruling of cancellation.

467. (Valuation)
1. The execution court may appoint a valuer and order a valuation of the vessel.
2. The valuer must obtain the permission of the execution court in order to request the assistance of the bailiff pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Article 338 (Ensuring performance of duties by bailiffs, etc.).

3. When carrying out an examination for the purpose of valuation, the valuer may board the vessel, question the debtor in execution or other third party in possession of the vessel and/or request the submission of documents by said persons.

4. A bailiff whose assistance has been requested under Paragraph 2 of Article 338 (Ensuring performance of duties by bailiffs, etc.) may take the necessary measures to open locked doors if required in cases where the valuer boards a vessel pursuant to Paragraph 3.

468. (Determination of minimum sale price)
1. The execution court shall determine the minimum sale price on the basis of the valuation by the valuer.

2. Where it deems necessary, the execution court may change the minimum sale price.

3. Article 435 (Measures to be taken if there is likely to be a deficit) the provisions shall apply mutatis mutandis for execution against vessel.

469. (Method of sale, etc.)
1. Sale of the vessel shall be by tender or auction or such other method as may be prescribed by the execution court.

2. In the case of sale by tender or auction, the execution court shall set the date, time and place of sale, and have the bailiff carry out the sale.

3. In the case of sale under Paragraph 2, the court clerk shall give public notice with a description of the vessel to be sold, the minimum sale price and the date, time and place of sale.

4. In the case of sales under Paragraph 2, Article 396 (Maintenance of order in the sale premises) shall apply mutatis mutandis.

470. (Guarantee of offer to purchase)
1. Any person wishing to offer to purchase a vessel shall provide a guarantee in the amount equivalent to 10 percent of the minimum sale price, provided that the execution court may set a guarantee that exceeds this amount when it finds appropriate.

2. On request by a person other than the highest bidder, the execution court shall promptly return the guarantee prescribed under Paragraph 1 after the sale has been completed pursuant to Article 469 (Method of sale, etc.).

471. (Prohibition of offer to purchase by debtor in execution)
No debtor in execution shall be entitled to make an offer to purchase a vessel.

472. (Date for ruling of sale)

1. The execution court shall set a date for the purpose of ruling on sale and shall declare whether to permit or to refuse to permit the sale.

2. If the execution court has set a date for ruling on sale, the execution court must give notice to that effect to the persons with a relationship of interest.

473. (Statements of opinion concerning permission or refusal to permit sale)
Persons having an interest in the permission or refusal of permission for sale of the vessel may state their opinions on the date for ruling of sale concerning any grounds listed in Paragraph 2 of Article 474 (Permission or refusal of permission for sale) that affect their rights.

474. (Permission or refusal of permission for sale)
1. Except in cases described in Paragraph 2, the execution court shall issue a ruling permitting sale.

2. Where any of following grounds is found, the execution court must issue a finding refusing permission for sale:

(a) the auction proceedings should not be commenced or continued;
(b) the highest bidder is not qualified or incapable of purchasing the vessel, or its representative is not authorized to purchase the vessel;

(c) an application is made for refusal of permission for sale under Paragraph 1 of Article 476 (Application for refusal of permission for sale in a case where the vessel has been damaged, etc.);

(d) there is a serious error in the procedure for ruling of minimum sale price; and/or

(e) there is a serious error in the sale procedures.

475. (Chomtoah appeal against ruling permitting or refusing to permit sale)
1. An interested party may file a Chomtoah appeal against a ruling permitting or refusing to permit a sale, but only in cases where such party's rights would be infringed by such ruling.

2. A Chomtoah appeal against a ruling permitting sale must cite the existence of one of the grounds listed in Paragraph 2 of the 6 Article 474 (Permission or refusal of permission for sale) or of a serious error in the procedures of the ruling permitting the sale.

3. If it deems necessary, the Chomtoah appeal court may designate a respondent to the Chomtoah appellant.

4. A ruling permitting or refusing to permit a sale shall only become effective after it becomes final and binding.

476. (Application for refusal of permission for sale in a case where the vessel has been damaged, etc.)
1. If a vessel is seriously damaged by reason of natural disaster or other cause not attributable to fault on the part of the highest bidder or purchaser after the making of an offer to purchase, said highest bidder or purchaser may file a motion for disallowance of the sale prior to a ruling permitting sale being handed down, and for cancellation of such ruling if it has already been issued, until the time of payment of the price.

2. A Chomtoah appeal may be filed against a ruling on a motion for cancellation of a ruling allowing sale under Paragraph 1.

3. A ruling upon motion under Paragraph 1 canceling a ruling permitting sale shall not become effective until it becomes final and effective.

477. (Withdrawal of motion for auction after making of offer to purchase)
In order to withdraw a motion for auction after making an offer to purchase, a creditor in execution must obtain the consent of the highest bidder or purchaser as the case may be.

478. (Deadline for Payment of Price)
If the ruling permitting sale has become final and binding, the execution court shall promptly stipulate a deadline for payment of the price, and notify the purchaser thereof.

479. (Payment of the price)
1. When a ruling permitting sale becomes final and binding, the purchaser must pay the price to the execution court within the period stipulated by that court pursuant to Article 478 (Deadline for Payment of Price).

2. The money paid by the purchaser as guarantee of its offer to purchase shall be applied to payment of the price.

480. (Time of acquisition of vessel)
The purchaser acquires the vessel at the time of payment of the price.

481. (Effect of non-payment of price)
1. If the purchaser does not pay the price, the ruling permitting sale shall lapse. In such a case, the purchaser shall have no right to demand return of the guarantee paid under Article 470 (Guarantee of offer to purchase).

2. In the event of Paragraph 1, the execution court must once again execute an auction.

3. The Purchaser set forth in Paragraph 1 cannot make an offer to purchase under an auction as prescribed in Paragraph 2.

482. (Request for registration based on payment of price)
1. Upon payment of the price by the purchaser, the court clerk shall direct the noting and striking off of the following matters in the register:

(a) the noting of the transfer of the rights acquired by the purchaser; and
(b) the striking off of the attachment or provisional attachment.
2. The direction to the registrar under Paragraph 1 shall be accompanied by an authenticated copy of the ruling permitting sale.

3. The costs of the request under Paragraph 1 shall be borne by the purchaser.

483. (Ruling ordering delivery up of vessel)
1. Upon motion by a purchaser who has paid the price, the execution court may issue a ruling ordering the debtor in execution or a person in possession of the vessel to deliver up the vessel to the purchaser, provided that this shall not apply in the case of a person who the court finds is in possession on the basis of title that prevails over the title of the purchaser according to the case record.

2. The purchaser cannot file a motion under Paragraph 1 after the lapse of 6 months from the date of payment of the price.

3. In the case of a ruling under Paragraph 1 against persons in possession other than the debtor in execution, the execution court shall examine such other person.

4. A Chomtoah appeal may be filed against a ruling on a motion under Paragraph 1.
5. A ruling under Paragraph 1 shall not come into effect until it becomes final and binding.

484. (Sale price)
The sale price to be applied to distribution shall consist of the following:
(a) the price of the vessel; and/or
(b) any guarantee the return of which cannot be demanded under the second sentence of Article 481 (Effect of non-payment of price).

485. (Demand for distribution)
1. The persons listed below are entitled to make a demand for distribution:
(a) creditors holding an authenticated copy of a title of execution who are entitled to effect execution in accordance with Paragraph 1 of Article 354 (Requirement for execution clause and which organs grant such clause);

(b) creditors who have registered provisional attachment after registration of attachment based on a ruling of commencement of auction;

(c) creditors who have effected execution using the method of confiscation of the vessel's certificate of registry, etc.; and/or

(d) persons with documentary evidence of general liens or liens over the vessel.
2. A Chomtoah appeal may be filed against a ruling dismissing a demand for distribution.

486. (The scope of creditors entitled to distribution)
The creditors listed below shall be entitled to distribution of the sale price:
(a) the attachment creditor(s);
(b) creditors who have made a demand for distribution not later than the last date for submission of demands for distribution; and/or

(c) creditors who have registered provisional attachment prior to registration of attachment based on a ruling of commencement of auction.
shower hery nov thort oy ke merl teit -z2

shower hery nov thort oy ke merl teit -z2

Section VI. Procedures for Distribution by Court
487. (Which court is to implement distribution)
The court to implement distribution shall be the court of first instance to which the bailiff belongs in the case of execution against movables, and the execution court in other cases.

488. (Preparations for distribution)
1. Upon the arising of any of the grounds described below, the court that is to carry out the distribution shall set a date for distribution and send notice of the date, time and place thereof to the creditors entitled to distribution and to the debtor:

(a) if in a case of execution against movables, the ground for deposit has been extinguished, in a case where there has been a report to a court under Paragraph 1 Article 400 (Deposit by bailiff with the court) or there has been a report under Article 401 (Report to court of first instance);

(b) if in a case of execution against a claim or other property rights, there has been a deposit (payment into court) under Article 412 (Collection Suits), a sale has been carried out pursuant to an order for sale under Article 413 (Ruling ordering sale) or the proceeds of sale have been submitted under Paragraph 2 of Article 414 (Execution of ruling of attachment of right to demand delivery of movables) ;

(c) if in a case of execution against an immovable, there has been payment of the sale price under Paragraph 1 of Article 447 (Payment of the price) or an application under the first sentence of Paragraph 3 of Article 447 (Payment of the price) has been made and a ruling permitting sale has become final and binding; or

(d) if in a case of execution against a vessel, there has been payment of the sale price under Article 479 (Payment of the price).

2. When the date of distribution has been fixed, the court clerk shall send a notice to each creditor to submit within one week, to the court that is to carry out the distribution, a statement of accounts indicating the principal of the claim, the interest until the date of distribution and the amount of execution costs.

489. (Implementation of distribution)
1. The court charged with distribution shall implement distribution in accordance with the distribution schedule in cases prescribed in Paragraph 1 of Article 488 (Preparations for distribution); provided that it shall not be necessary to follow the distribution schedule in cases prescribed in Paragraph 2.

2. If there is only one creditor, or where there are two or more creditors but the amount to be appropriated to distribution is sufficient to satisfy the claim of each creditor and the whole of the execution costs, the court responsible for distribution shall effect distribution to the creditor or creditors and deliver any surplus to the debtor in execution.

3. If after the time for distribution has arrived a document listed in Items (a) to (g) of Paragraph 1 of Article 370 (Stay and cancellation of execution) is filed, and there are creditors entitled to distribution other than the creditor(s) in execution, the court charged with distribution shall effect distribution to such creditors.

4. Even if after the time for distribution has arrived a document listed in Items (a) or (b) of Paragraph 2 of Article 370 (Stay and cancellation of execution) is filed, the court charged with distribution shall carry out distribution to such creditors.

490. (Preparation of distribution schedule)
1. The court responsible for distribution shall prepare a distribution schedule on the date of distribution except as providing in Paragraph 2 of Article 489 (Implementation of distribution).

2. On the date of distribution, the court shall summon the creditors in execution set forth below, together with the debtor(s) in execution:
(a) Execution against movables Creditors prescribed in Article 398 (Scope of creditors entitled to distribution)

(b) Execution against claims and other property rights Creditors prescribed in Article 415 (Scope of creditors eligible for distribution)

(c) Execution against immovables Creditors prescribed in Article 453 (The scope of creditors entitled to distribution)

(d) Execution against vessel Creditors prescribed in Article 486 (The scope of creditors entitled to distribution)

3. For the purpose of preparing the distribution schedule, the court shall examine the creditors and debtor(s) in execution who appear at court on the date of distribution, and shall verify such documentary evidence as can be verified on the spot.

4. The claim principal, the interest and other incidental claims, amount of execution costs, priority of distribution and amount shall be noted alongside the following amounts:

(a) Execution against movables Amount of proceeds of sale of attached articles and amount of money attached

(b) Execution against claims and other property rights Amount to be distributed

(c) Execution against immovables Amount of proceeds of sale
(d) Execution against vessel Amount of sale price
5. The priority and amount of distribution prescribed in Paragraph 4 shall be recorded in accordance with the agreement of all the creditors on the date of distribution, if such agreement is achieved, and in other cases in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code, Commercial Code or other relevant law.

6. For the purposes of distribution, claims subject to a certain time stipulation which have not matured shall be deemed to have matured.

491. (Objection to entry in distribution table)
1. Any creditor, or any debtor in execution, who is dissatisfied with the claims of creditors or the amounts for distribution noted in a distribution table, may state an objection on the date of distribution.

2. The court responsible for implementing the distribution shall proceed to distribution of that portion of the distribution table to which there is no objection.

3. If a creditor in execution or creditor who has submitted a demand for distribution by virtue of an authenticated copy of enforceable title of execution receives payment of the whole of his/her claim, the debtor in execution may demand that the court clerk deliver up to him/her the authenticated copy of enforceable title of execution submitted by such creditor.

4. Where the case has finished, in circumstances other those described in Paragraph 3, the creditor described therein may demand that the court clerk deliver up to him/her the authenticated copy of enforceable title of execution; provided that if such creditor receives partial payment of his/her claim, the court clerk shall note such amount on the authenticated copy prior to delivering it up.

492. (Suit of objection by creditor who has stated an objection to the contents of a distribution table)
1. A creditor who has stated an objection to any entry in a distribution table shall file a suit of objection to such entry, naming the other party to the motion of objection as the defendant.

2. The court that is to effect the distribution shall have jurisdiction over suits described in Paragraph 1.

3. Unless a creditor who has stated an objection to an entry in a distribution table proves, not later than one week following the date of distribution, that the creditor has filed a suit described in Paragraph 1, the objection shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

4. If a court finds in its judgment in a suit under Paragraph 1 that the objection is well founded, it shall cancel the distribution table in order that an amended or new distribution table may be prepared.

493. (Suit of objection by debtor in execution to contents of table of distribution)
1. A debtor in execution who has stated an objection to any entry in a distribution table against a creditor holding an authenticated copy of enforceable title of execution shall file a suit of objection to claim, naming the creditor who is the other party to the motion of objection as the defendant.

2. A debtor in execution who has stated an objection to any entry in a distribution table against a creditor who does not hold an authenticated copy of enforceable title of execution shall file a suit of objection to distribution, naming the creditor who is the other party to the motion of objection as the defendant.

3. The court that is to effect the distribution shall have jurisdiction over suits described in Paragraph 2.

4. Unless not later than one week following the date of distribution, a debtor in execution who has stated an objection to an entry in a distribution table proves the filing of a suit described in Paragraph 1 and files an authenticated copy of a decision staying execution by virtue of such suit, or proves the filing of a suit described in Paragraph 2, the objection shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

5. If the court that is to execute the distribution finds in its judgment under Paragraph 2 that the objection is well founded, it shall cancel the table of distribution in order to amend it or prepare a new table.

494. (Retention of amount of distribution)
1. If any of the following grounds applies to a claim to which a creditor is entitled, the court that is to implement the distribution shall retain such amount:

(a) the claim is subject to a condition precedent or uncertain time stipulation;
(b) the claim belongs to a provisional attachment creditor;
(c) a document listed in Paragraph 2, Item (a) of Article 370 (Stay and cancellation of execution) has been submitted;

(d) an authenticated copy of a decision temporarily enjoining the exercise of a lien, pledge or hypothec relating to the claim has been submitted; and/or

(e) a suit of objection to an entry in a distribution table has been filed under Paragraph 1 of Article 492 (Suit of objection by creditor who has stated an objection to the contents of a distribution table) or Paragraph 2 of Article 493 (Suit of objection by debtor in execution to contents of table of distribution).

2. The court that is to execute the distribution shall retain the amount of distribution to any creditor who fails to appear at the court to receive such distribution.

495. (Implementation of distribution upon confirmation of rights, etc.)
1. If the ground of retention of distribution under Paragraph 1 of Article 494 (Retention of amount of distribution) disappears, the court that is to implement distribution shall proceed to distribute the retained money.

2. Where distribution is to be carried out under Paragraph 1, the court that is to implement distribution shall alter the distribution table even on behalf of creditors who have not stated an objection to an entry in the distribution table in the following cases:

(a) if it is no longer possible to make a distribution to a creditor whose distribution has been retained for a cause described in Items (a) through (d) of Paragraph 1 of Article 494 (Retention of amount of distribution);and/or

(b) if a creditor whose distribution has been retained for a reason described in Item (e) of Paragraph 1 of Article 494(Retention of amount of distribution) loses in a suit of objection to an entry in the distribution table filed by the debtor in execution under Paragraph 2 of Article 493 (Suit of objection by debtor in execution to contents of table of distribution).

Kategori

Kategori